To be brief: I agree with "Felipe Butter." Almost everything. ( see ) If you do not threaten to physically attack a homosexual couple to kiss in front of the kindergarten of their daughters, subscribe to all their predicament, his whole position. Never, under any circumstances, endorse the arbitrary use of physical violence.
For example, when I was a homosexual from all sides, above and below, I strongly feel assaulted, in my personal tastes and criteria, and exceeded by mariconada displayed caricaturizantes at all hours of the day on Peruvian television.
One, because we do a disservice to the "gay community" the grossly diffuse correlation is usually made between being homosexual and disforzado scandal.
Two, because each person is homosexual or not, has the inalienable right to establish their own canons of aesthetics, morality, sense of decency, and especially modes of representation. And they must be respected and not qualified for anything.
's not homophobia or anything, remember that our rights end where they begin another. Yes, it's okay to defend the right to kiss in the light of day because there's nothing wrong, but we have no right to depreciate and make fun of those who in their rightful places do not accept such behavior.
Any enforcement is an injury. I should not go to kiss a Catholic cathedral where such practices are institutionally-censorship as much as to me seems a sample of natural affection. Similarly, a child who he wants to play my tree climbing on private, should not, however much they have the right to play. A play park.
A kiss at the park on busy streets, in malls, airports, fast food restaurants in the valleys and deserts. But not in the atrium of the Cathedral. Not in a synagogue. Not in a mosque. Not in the door of a school for children. Not in those places where my right star to the right, proper of their religious precepts of his own free choice.
0 comments:
Post a Comment